ZIM Integrated Shipping Stock Discussion

• 袁 缘缘 妙不可言 : Tariff.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• TWIMO (151403908) OP 袁 缘缘 妙不可言 : more tariffs announced in May?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 袁 缘缘 妙不可言 TWIMO (151403908) OP : Tariffs were announced in April and began to decline. Then in May, the affected goods arrived in the USA, but there were few goods at the ports.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 73372627 : In fact was not tariffs. was more 100% shorted on the hews that they expand theirs flot. If not wrong they ordered 2.8 Billions in China for the new ships.
  If tariffs will be as is now, we will see decresing shipping in 3-4 month from now and this it is because the tariffs was not announced with retro. The tariff generally apply for unshiped orders starting with the date on application.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Nalin 102978700 : why dividend very high ? how they effort to pay that much ?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• TWIMO (151403908) : Hi NG, unfortunately I’m caught holding ZIM as it looked more attractive than SB when I entered. Even with the dividend, feels like a mistake under such economic clouds… There are more promising stocks to look at I reckon… Please share your thoughts if you have a few minutes .

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Nidia_Girl OP Nalin 102978700 : high dividend is high risk also .. but this more of a trade not long term hold

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Nidia_Girl OP TWIMO (151403908) : Zim can rebound a lot if or when they lower those tariffs and imports begin pouring in again , at the moment they look like massive drop in imports , the longer this happens the more likely the stock can drop unfortunately

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Minotor : why do you want  a trade deal with china - when trump is reviving the Trans Pacific Partnership trade agreement with India and the remaining countries ?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• gghjh hghj : It's just a unilateral statement from the USA. Given the current situation, what is there to talk about? What can be used for negotiation? What China wants, the USA is not willing to sell. Consider what else the two countries have that is worth discussing.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 151490696 Minotor : the problem is, china has the best tech, experience and quality control from the manufacturer perspective. this is partly due to its years of experience in  manufacturing AND the dictatorship, hence the efficiency and effectiveness.
  SE asia is considered lower end of the manufacturing with relatively lower technical requirements, in short, you can make clothes and shoes from vietnam and Bangladesh. good luck making smart phones and computers in those countries.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Slic3 151490696 : they also copy our products we hire them to make and sell behind our backs

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• Minotor 151490696 : search TPP trade  agreement - and you will understand what is at stake here  - you are looking at a mega  trade deal with Japan, South korea , india, australia , vietnam, mexico and canada  to compete against china - trump did not want to join in 2018 unless the terms were better  - trump is very serious about decoupling  - but to tour point this comes with disruption ans pain.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

View more comments...

• qooqoo : How the tariffs affect Zim?

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• 73372627 : Depend on reorganisation of the shipping ports of exit and ports of entry. Trading reorganisation.
  Due to the US vs China trading war, it is to see how can affect Zim on theirs order for new shipps (26) build in China and suppose to be delivered in 2026.
  Could affect because manny parts are manufacture in US and the shipps communications and computing are all made in US and few in Europe. If those parts will move to be manufatured or assembly in Israel, then no increase in shipp build will be.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply

• ColdJoke : The trade war is raging, signing new contracts. Impressive.

  Report

  Reply
  Cancel Reply